UPDATED 12/27/24 – BOI Reporting Requirements Reinstated – Earliest Filing Deadline Now January 13, 2025
Dec 27, 2024
UPDATE 12/27/2024: BOI Whiplash? Fifth Circuit Reverses Course, Blocks BOI Reporting in reversal decision, read the full NFIB article here!
On December 23, 2024, a federal court of appeals lifted the injunction on the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). Effective immediately, the Act’s BOI reporting requirements are reinstated.
In response to the court’s ruling, FinCEN has recognized the need for additional time to comply, therefore granting a 12-day extension so that most BOI filings are now due by January 13, 2025.
FINCEN issued the following alert:
In light of a December 23, 2024, federal Court of Appeals decision, reporting companies, except as indicated below, are once again required to file beneficial ownership information with FinCEN. However, because the Department of the Treasury recognizes that reporting companies may need additional time to comply given the period when the preliminary injunction had been in effect, we have extended the reporting deadline as follows:
- Reporting companies that were created or registered prior to January 1, 2024 have until January 13, 2025 to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN. (These companies would otherwise have been required to report by January 1, 2025.)
- Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after September 4, 2024 that had a filing deadline between December 3, 2024 and December 23, 2024 have until January 13, 2025 to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
- Reporting companies created or registered in the United States on or after December 3, 2024 and on or before December 23, 2024 have an additional 21 days from their original filing deadline to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN.
- Reporting companies that qualify for disaster relief may have extended deadlines that fall beyond January 13, 2025. These companies should abide by whichever deadline falls later.
- Reporting companies that are created or registered in the United States on or after January 1, 2025 have 30 days to file their initial beneficial ownership information reports with FinCEN after receiving actual or public notice that their creation or registration is effective.
- As indicated in the alert titled “Notice Regarding National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.)”, Plaintiffs in National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala.)—namely, Isaac Winkles, reporting companies for which Isaac Winkles is the beneficial owner or applicant, the National Small Business Association, and members of the National Small Business Association (as of March 1, 2024)—are not currently required to report their beneficial ownership information to FinCEN at this time.
For general information regarding the CTA and BOI reporting requirements being reinstated, please refer to William Vaughan Company’s BOI Insights & Resource Hub.
Categories: Tax Compliance
What the Recent Injunction Against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) Means for Your Business
Dec 05, 2024
On Tuesday, a federal court in Texas issued a nationwide injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). The CTA, which was set to require an estimated 32.5 million companies in the U.S. to report sensitive information about their beneficial owners (BOI) to FinCEN by January 1, 2025, is now on hold due to constitutional concerns.
What Does This Mean for You?
The court’s decision means that companies are no longer obligated to meet the January 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline or comply with related CTA requirements. While this provides immediate relief, the ruling is not necessarily final. The federal government is expected to appeal, and higher courts, including the Supreme Court, may weigh in.
For now, the CTA’s enforcement is paused. However, the broader legal battle is likely to continue, and the final outcome remains uncertain.
Our Recommendation
We advise clients to remain proactive:
- Continue Gathering Information: If your business falls under the CTA’s reporting requirements, we recommend you gather the necessary BOI information. Preparing now will help ensure compliance should the injunction be lifted or the requirements reinstated. Check out our BOI Insights & Resource Hub for details.
- Stay Informed: Legal and regulatory landscapes can shift quickly. We will continue to monitor developments closely and provide updates as the situation evolves.
- Be Ready to File: While enforcement is currently halted, the best course of action is to be prepared to submit your BOI report promptly if needed.
The implications of the Corporate Transparency Act injunction go beyond compliance and touch on broader concerns about federal authority and privacy. Rest assured, we are here to guide you through these changes and keep you informed. If you have questions or need assistance navigating these requirements, please get in touch with a member of our BOI reporting team at wvco.com/contact-us.
Categories: Tax Compliance
Understanding the Visa and Mastercard Settlement
May 21, 2024
What You Need to Know About the $5.54 Billion Credit Card Settlement
Recently, credit card giants Visa and Mastercard reached a $5.54 billion settlement with merchants overinflated credit card interchange fees, commonly known as “swipe fees.” This decades-long legal battle has resulted in the largest antitrust class-action settlement in U.S. history.
What Does This Mean for Merchants and Consumers?
While the Visa and Mastercard settlement still awaits approval by a federal court, its approval could benefit not only merchants but consumers as well.
Key Points of the Settlement:
- Visa and Mastercard have agreed to lower published credit-card interchange fees by four basis points in the U.S. for at least three years.
- Neither company will raise interchange fees for five years above the rates that were in place at the end of 2023.
According to a statement from one of the law firms involved in the settlement, “the interchange fee reduction could save merchants $29.79 billion in the five years after the settlement is approved.”
Eligibility for Claim Submission
If your business accepted Visa and/or Mastercard between January 1, 2004, and January 25, 2019, you may be eligible for a share of a $5.54 billion payment card settlement. This includes businesses that have since closed or gone bankrupt.
How to Submit a Claim
In an Order dated May 14, 2024, the Court granted an extension of the claims-filing deadline. The new deadline to submit claims is now August 30, 2024.
The official court-authorized settlement website can be found here.
There are two methods by which you can submit a claim:
- If you received a Claim Form in the mail and want to file a claim online using the Claimant ID provided, you will select that option on the settlement website.
- If you did not receive a claim form in the mail, you can begin the claim filing process by clicking the button for Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). Once you create your account using your TIN, you will need to provide supporting proof of authorization documentation in order to access your interchange transaction fees. Proof of authorization could be a certificate of incorporation, a certificate of dissolution, a W-9, or a utility bill.
For step-by-step instructions on submitting a claim by either method, review the following video provided by the court-authorized website: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuHOnvlVFpI
Potential Settlement Payout
The amount you receive from the settlement fund will be based on your actual or estimated interchange fees attributable to Visa and Mastercard transactions between January 1, 2004, and January 25, 2019.
Factors Influencing Payout Amount:
- The total dollar value of all valid claims filed.
- The cost of class administration and notice.
- Applicable taxes on the settlement fund.
- Attorney fees and expenses.
Money awards to the Rule 23(b)(3) Class Plaintiffs for their representation of merchants in MDL 1720, culminating in the Class Settlement Agreement, all approved by the Court.
Conclusion
The Visa and Mastercard settlement represents a significant resolution to a long-standing issue affecting merchants and consumers. By understanding the details and eligibility criteria, businesses may use this settlement to recoup some costs incurred from inflated swipe fees. For more information and to submit your claim, visit the official settlement website: https://www.paymentcardsettlement.com/en
Categories: Other Resources
Moore v. United States: The Supreme Court’s Tax Dilemma
Dec 13, 2023
In the world of taxes, all eyes have been on the Supreme Court and the case of Moore v. United States. What makes this case so monumental, you ask? It’s not every day that the Supreme Court hears arguments around tax laws affecting individuals, much less a high-stakes case that could redefine the meaning of taxable income.
At the heart of Moore v. United States is a provision of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (TCJA) enacted in 2017, requiring companies to pay taxes on foreign profits that had previously been untaxed. This mandatory repatriation tax is now being called unconstitutional by one Washington state couple.
In 2005, Charles and Kathleen Moore invested $40,000 in KisanKraft, a farm equipment retailer based out of India. The couple alleges that they never received any foreign profit payments from the company because all such profits were reinvested by KisanKraft. The Moores argue that such “unrealized gains” are not actually income and therefore should not be taxed. Their case argues that the TCJA provision violates apportionment requirements under the 16th Amendment because it allegedly taxes them on ownership of personal property — in this case, their KisanKraft shares — rather than on realized or received income.
While the Moores are simply seeking a refund of the one-time $15,000 increase in their tax bill due to the change in the law, the case carries much broader implications. A ruling in their favor could threaten other provisions of the tax code. The Justice Department has also noted that a ruling by the Supreme Court invalidating the mandatory repatriation tax could cost the U.S. government $340 billion over the next decade. That amount could grow exponentially if the decision invalidates other tax provisions as well.
While a ruling is not expected until June of 2024, some justices have signaled the possibility of upholding the tax by attributing the income earned by the foreign company to its shareholders. William Vaughan Company’s tax team is closely monitoring updates in the Moore v. United States case. Be sure to subscribe to our insights as we continue to share any breaking news on the ruling.
Categories: Tax Compliance
Should I Cancel My Ohio CAT Account?
Sep 26, 2023
Commercial Activity Tax Changes Under Ohio House Bill 33
We recently covered the changes to Ohio’s tax codes that were enacted by Ohio House Bill 33 after it’s passage into law in July of 2023. The new law introduced several changes to state tax codes that could prove advantageous for Ohio business owners. One of the more significant changes to the tax law relates to how CAT is reported.
The CAT is calculated using a business’s taxable gross receipts. As a result of the passing bill, beginning January 1, 2024, the CAT annual minimum tax will be eliminated, and the exemption amounts for businesses will be significantly increased. Under the new law, the CAT rate of .26% will stay the same, but will now only affect taxpayers with gross receipts over $3 million in 2024, (that number will increase to $6 million in 2025).
Taxpayer Implications
Businesses currently reporting under $1 million in gross receipts, and that are predicted to have less than $3 million in gross receipts in 2024, should cancel their CAT account effective December 31, 2023, and file a final annual CAT return, due May 10, 2024. Once the final CAT return is filed, taxpayers with gross receipts under the exemption amount will no longer have to file an annual CAT return in subsequent years. Taxpayers that predict they will have annual gross receipts between $3 million and $6 million should file their final CAT return the following year, 2025. All remaining CAT payers that do not meet the exclusion amount must still file quarterly returns for tax periods after January 1, 2024.
If a taxpayer does not cancel their CAT account, they will still be required to file a CAT return until the account is canceled, even if nothing is due. Taxpayers may cancel their CAT account by visiting the CAT Cancel Account Transaction on the Ohio Department of Taxation’s Business Gateway (preferred method.) Alternatively, those wishing to cancel their CAT account can also complete and submit a “Business Account Update Form” available in the “Tax Forms” section of the Ohio Department of Taxation’s website.
If a business’s gross receipts happen to exceed the exclusion amount in subsequent periods, the taxpayer must reactivate their CAT account and resume filing returns and paying the Commercial Activity Tax at that time.
Conclusion
Ohio House Bill 33 has made several alterations to Ohio’s tax laws, with the regulations around Commercial Activity Tax being particularly affected. For more information on these changes, visit the official release from the Ohio Department of Taxation.
William Vaughan Company will continue to monitor the changes resulting from this bill as well as other state and federal tax bills.
Questions or concerns about how these changes apply to your specific CAT filings? Connect with us today to get a better understanding of these new developments and mitigate tax risks in your business.
Categories: Tax Compliance